|
 |
In article <3a0b8584$1@news.povray.org>, Ken Cecka <cec### [at] home com>
wrote:
> I've just started playing around with isosurfaces in MP0.6a, and have
> been a little confused about what keywords are/aren't alowed when
> defining functions. In particular, I wanted to use the rand()
> function, but I get the error "float factor expected but rand found
> instead". As far as I know, rand() returns a float factor, so this
> error doesn't make sense to me. Are function expressions parsed
> differently than other pov code so that they only allow a particular
> subset of the available functions?
Yes. Instead of calling the functions immediately, the function is read
and used to create a data structure that can be quickly evaluated
multiple times during rendering. The rand() function would be useless
here, it would just return a new value *every time the function was
evaluated*, making it impossible for the isosurface algorithm to find a
surface.(though it still could be useful for some patterns and if
functions are allowed to be called in scene code)
Not all functions which return floats are allowed, there is a list of
allowed keywords in the documentation. (5.2.12. New keywords / operators
for the isosurface patch)
To do what you want, declare a variable with the random number and use
that variable in the function. This will calculate *one* random number
and use it in the function, instead of calculating a new one every time
the function is used.
> P.S. Another question I had, which I am getting the impression is a
> feature which is not yet avaiable, was how to define functions which
> accept variables like the builtin functions do. Is this possible, or
> does have to be done by building the function in a precompiled
> library?
It is currently impossible without modifying the source. And be aware
that the built in functions probably won't make it into POV 3.5.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] mac com, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
 |