In article <3df2361b@news.povray.org>, "Tony[B]" <ben### [at] catholicorg> 
wrote:

> Yes, that's true. I agree. But still... This file is like from 1987, isn't
> there the possibility that from then to now something in it could be
> improved in some other equivalent library? :)

Why? It does what it needs to do, so why change it? You're just spending 
time writing and debugging new code, increasing the risk of problems for 
no actual benefit. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
Especially when there are other things that *are* broken.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message