|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <3AC76B05.2FF7A4E6@gmx.de>, Christoph Hormann
<chr### [at] gmx de> wrote:
> This took quite a lot of time to render (20 h for trace, 29 min for
> photons) and i'm still not really satisfied. Guess i will have to do some
> real world studies with a pot of water in the garden...
It looks good, but judging from the scale of the water ripples and
caustics, the structure is a very small scale model, maybe 5 feet long.
Much smaller than expected, anyway...
> What i would really like to try is using an isosurface for the water
> instead of the normal, but i'm a bit afraid of the render time.
I'm not sure if it would make much of a difference in appearance, but
the render time shouldn't be to bad if you don't use pigment functions.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] mac com, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |