In article <39e4b752@news.povray.org>, "Philippe Debar" 
<phi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:

> What I originally had in mind when I thought about this syntax was 
> something like :

I will get started on it... :-)
This is actually similar to what my scaled turbulence patch did, though 
quite a bit more versatile(and a tiny bit slower). Right now though, I 
am working on getting blurred transparence to work(again). I am totally 
rewriting my previous patch, and both transparence and reflection will 
use the same blur code. I also hope to have a faster(but less accurate) 
type of blur available...

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message