POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : StayHappy : Re: StayHappy Server Time
1 Oct 2024 05:21:36 EDT (-0400)
  Re: StayHappy  
From: Chris Huff
Date: 12 Sep 2000 17:44:00
Message: <chrishuff-89FD90.16455212092000@news.povray.org>
In article <39be65d0@news.povray.org>, "Equiprawn" <equ### [at] tinetie> 
wrote:

> No, MegaPov media. I tried both type 2 and type 3, but the quality of 
> each in this scene seemed the same, and there was no apparent change 
> in render time - I stopped each run after 20 hours, and both were 
> only about half way.

Simply changing the method won't make it much faster...the main 
advantage to method 2 and 3 is that they let you get smooth results with 
lower settings.


> Interestingly, both types introduced strange speckles in the clouds (I
> didn't try type 1), not like poorly sampled media, but just random lingle
> specks here and there.

Odd...

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.