|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <39e3aa1a@news.povray.org>, "Nathan Kopp" <Nat### [at] Kopp com>
wrote:
> The intent is for one warp block to describe one warp. If we want
> multiple warps (as your examples do) then I think it would be good to
> have multiple warp blocks. If you want to specify more than one warp
> in a single block, then you should name the block with the plural
> "warps" instead of singular "warp".
Hmm, I always thought it acted similar to the transform{} block...but if
a warp{} block is considered to be one warp, it certainly would make
sense to have the transformations affect it like they would a pattern or
object, instead of acting like warps themselves.
--
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] mac com, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org, http://tag.povray.org/
<><
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |