|
 |
In article <3dcd5f8f$1@news.povray.org>, "Hugo" <hua### [at] post3 teledk>
wrote:
> That sounds great. What about digi-cams? Are they inferior in this field?
Not really sure what you are asking...the CCD will have a different
response curve than film or the human eye. Some of them might do
filtering to end up with something closer to film, or just something
that looks better. The design of the CCD element probably matters as
well.
They can't really be inferior or superior to POV, since they have quite
different information. POV has essentially unbounded float triples with
the "real" light intensities, cameras have fixed point values with the
raw output of CCD elements, restricted to a certain range.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
