|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <Xns### [at] 204 213 191 226>,
"Rafal 'Raf256' Maj" <raf### [at] raf256 com> wrote:
> > Since he is using 3.1, he doesn't have photons and the radiosity is
> > much worse.
>
> I was alsow as YOu suggesting switching to 3.5
I didn't see that in your message.
> > And I don't see why area lights, radiosity, or photons
> > would have any place in a shape demo scene.
> area_light - soft shadows
And slower rendering, with no benefit to the demonstration of the shapes
themselves.
> photons - reflections from few of this shapes
But still no help at displaying the shapes. These are "shape samplers".
> I write _maybe_ radiosity because imho it's effect will not be nottacible
> (unles i.e. changing scene to indor
The improved lighting radiosity gives would make the shapes easier to
see, but would slow things down, and for a scene this simple a few
lighting tricks would work better.
--
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlink net>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tag povray org
http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |