In article <i1tcqu4q7q0s51lajui5khjuu9j9gnijai@4ax.com>,
 ABX <abx### [at] abxartpl> wrote:

> Somehow I thought the Team is against CVSed holding of POV-Ray sources in any
> way but I agree it could be much better. I have never played with CVS but as
> far as I see from other packages it is interesting.

From the POV-Team Status Report - September 1, 2000 in 
povray.announce.frequently-asked-questions:

"Second, we are also hoping to use a much more open development model for
POV 4, with public read access to our source-revision tree.  System
analysis, design, and implementation of POV 4 will be a very large task,
and this is one way we hope to speed it up.  This open development model
would also hopefully provide development releases (snapshots) more 
quickly to the power-user community, similar to what MegaPov offers now."

They don't use CVS, so that specifically wouldn't be possible unless 
they decide to change their system, but I don't think you meant to 
exclude all other code management software.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <cja### [at] earthlinknet>
http://home.earthlink.net/~cjameshuff/
POV-Ray TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message