In article <39C### [at] peakeduee>, Margus Ramst 
<mar### [at] peakeduee> wrote:

> AFAIK, no. It would only work only if the new image doesn't include 
> areas of the scene invisible in the original image.

I think it will compute extra samples for areas that weren't sampled 
before, so that isn't the problem. However, if the scene is dynamic, for 
instance, if there is a ball rolling through it, things probably won't 
work right. In other words, the only kind of animation you can do with 
this method is one where only the camera moves.

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message