|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <npi78us6q6d2j26cb36bas87g60s17hhhv@4ax.com>,
Peter Popov <pet### [at] vip bg> wrote:
> >That's true, but a good guess, after all.. The native HF should be able to
> >look as good as Zeager's IMO.
>
> Ditto, but I fear it is too late for such deep changes in the 3.5
> code.
I think it would depend on how hard it is to find and fix. It would be a
bug fix, not a new feature...
> Having it as a macro in the distro could be useful, though.
Um, have you looked? The HF_Square() macro in shapes.inc doesn't use
this method, but it should give better results, especially when using
entirely procedural height fields.
--
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] mac com>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tag povray org
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |