In article <npi78us6q6d2j26cb36bas87g60s17hhhv@4ax.com>,
 Peter Popov <pet### [at] vipbg> wrote:

> >That's true, but a good guess, after all.. The native HF should be able to
> >look as good as Zeager's IMO.
> 
> Ditto, but I fear it is too late for such deep changes in the 3.5
> code.

I think it would depend on how hard it is to find and fix. It would be a 
bug fix, not a new feature...


> Having it as a macro in the distro could be useful, though.

Um, have you looked? The HF_Square() macro in shapes.inc doesn't use 
this method, but it should give better results, especially when using 
entirely procedural height fields.

-- 
Christopher James Huff <chr### [at] maccom>
POV-Ray TAG e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
TAG web site: http://tag.povray.org/

Post a reply to this message