In article <3aa2d829@news.povray.org>, "Rune" <run### [at] inamecom> 
wrote:

> That should be possible. But not to keep equalised distances between the
> points if that's what you had in mind.

No need to keep the particles rigidly linked...just a simple particle 
string, with a bunch of "passive" particles and one "active" particle.


> But I still don't see what would be the use. Just an effect that 
> could be funny to try out?

Exactly...might be something like a worm on wet ground, or a snake...


> > Do you somehow mess with the velocity so it doesn't
> > bounce, but doesn't impact on the surface?
> 
> Err, I don't follow you anymore.

Do you adjust the direction of the particle so it goes parallel with the 
surface instead of hitting it again and bouncing?

-- 
Christopher James Huff
Personal: chr### [at] maccom, http://homepage.mac.com/chrishuff/
TAG: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg, http://tag.povray.org/

<><

Post a reply to this message