Severi Salminen wrote:
> Christoph Hormann wrote:
> 
>> These seem all heavily post processed (in most cases even composites 
>> from several photographs).  None on them looks like a realistic photo 
>> to me.
> 
> That is because of what you expect.

No, that's because they are physically impossible.  No photographic 
technique can generate a photo where a brightness difference of the 
scene in reality is inverted on the photo (i.e. a part brighter than a 
second one in reality is darker than the second one on the photo).

>> Remember: i am not saying you can't tweak a photo to look similar to 
>> Jaime's render.  I am just saying that the lighting in the scene is 
>> not completely realistic and a photo of such a scenery that is not 
>> heavily altered would look quite a bit different.
> 
> 
> How about the third photo on this page:
> 
> http://www.smsu.edu/design/projects/Library2.htm
> 
> It at least resembles Jaime's photo distantly. 

Not at all, the lighting situation is completely different - one whole 
wall of the room is windows - even without the covering of the windows 
Jaime's room would only have less than 1/3 of one wall as windows.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Jul. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message