Wolfgang Wieser wrote:
> 
>>- document it well
>>
> 
> What is the preferred way for the documentation?

Well readable, understandable, elaborate and correct.  Everything else 
is quite unimportant (and history shows that these are the weak points 
in patch documentation, not the file formats etc.)

> 
>>- do test renders to check for possible problems
>>
> 
> The patch is actually fairly well-tested for 3.5. 
> 

I have not yet seen any examples on how it performs memory wise (which 
will obviously be *the* problem of such a patch) same for how it 
interferes with radiosity and antialiasing.

Christoph

-- 
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 06 Jul. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______

Post a reply to this message