|
 |
On Thu, 06 Dec 2001 22:49:43 GMT, ken### [at] uniplan it (Angelo 'kENpEX' Pesce) wrote:
> I'm not doing any critic to current povray status
I feel it between lines :-)
> but many (not every) ppl here replyied me just saying this is
> impossible
Sometimes impossible according to POV, not impossible at all imo.
> that, povray already supports this thing and better than
> every other renderer
You should replace "and" with "sometimes" imo
> the thread just died...
There is nonsense for another repeat in the same thread.
> For example the nurbs stuff, most
> ppl here believed that those should be done by the modeller so the
> mesh support in povray was already the "state of the art".
Is there any universal modeller without nurbs traingulated just for screen
presentation?
> Well, when
> I demonstrated that most commercial renderers support nurbs directly
> noone talked about this, they said those ideas are already known...
They said it before your demonstration. And you missed other arguments.
> How can U tell that if many ppl believed that this was simply a bad
> thing to do?
But... who is "U" in this question ? Vahur ?
ABX
--
#declare _=function(a,b,x){((a^2)+(b^2))^.5-x}#default {pigment{color rgb 1}}
union{plane{y,-3}plane{-x,-3}finish{reflection 1 ambient 0}}isosurface{ //ABX
function{_(x-2,y,1)|_((x+y)*.7,z,.1)|_((x+y+2)*.7,z,.1)|_(x/2+y*.8+1.5,z,.1)}
contained_by{box{<0,-3,-.1>,<3,0,.1>}}translate z*15finish{ambient 1}}//POV35
Post a reply to this message
|
|
