On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 18:34:09 -0600, "Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom>
wrote:

>"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>news:ml9s40pbquu74smg1ka7d7klvqbqhqg1s0@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:36:27 -0800, "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >"IMBJR" <no### [at] spamhere> wrote in message
>> >news:dmop40lc06i3hvs7jedlt2jj4p74e992st@4ax.com...
>> >> >>     I appreciate the work that goes into them.
>> >> >
>> >> >heh, thank you for that considered and informative opinion. ;)
>> >>
>> >> I think he was referring to the work I put in them. Taking credit for
>> >> my effort is yet another sign of the stupidity I see in this group.
>> >
>> >Okay: point 1 - don't call me stupid.
>>
>> Re-read. I refered to the group in general as stupid ("stupidity I see
>> in this group"). If you take that as directed at you personally then
>> you did so off your own bat.
>
><and so forth />
>
>Wow, I'm catching up more on these threads and this is interesting.
>Everybody is stupid in something, like Scott Adams said. For example, many
>would have a case to say IMBJR that you're stupid when it comes to tact.
>Thing is, does being stupid in that one thing make you stupid in general?

That's like saying im lemon when it comes to tact, or fishburger, or
housetree or coupon when it comes to tact. Meaningless!

>

--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com

Post a reply to this message