On Mon, 4 Mar 2002 19:15:21 +0100, "JRG" <jrg### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>I don't think it's a good idea to have a flag which implies other flags. Why should
>the shadowless flag imply media_interaction off? I think each flag should be specific
>(that's why I'd personally love a no_radiosity and a no_specular flag).
Shadowless implies not casting shadows in scattering media. It should
not imply media_interraction off. If it does, it sounds like a bug.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] vipbg
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|