"Apache" <apa### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in
news:404e77e9$1@news.povray.org: 

> I understand IMBJR in his desire to promote an improved image format,
> but compatibility is very important here.
> As long as the common news readers and webbrowsers don't support an
> image format it's better to stick with tradition.
> Top quality images should be in png anyways (or 100% quality jpeg
> maybe) and for showing a new render to others the standard jpeg format
> seems to be sufficient. I haven't heard anything complain!
> 
> 

Apache >---Preach---->Choir
                        ^
                        |
                        ^
                       Tom




-- 
Tom
_________________________________
The Internet Movie Project
http://www.imp.org/

Post a reply to this message