"Aaron Gillies" <no### [at] nospamcom> wrote in news:3f4a5351$2@news.povray.org:

> I really prefer the image to be as high a quality as possible, although 

Same for me.


> I tend to think that around 200k is the upper limit and generally
> compress between 100-200k.  Am I doing the wrong thing?

Once again, I think the same, except that I do not mind seeing image at 
1024X768 or even bigger since my 21" is set at 1600X1200.

...if you calculate that modems users can D/L at an average of 3KB or 
5KB/Sec, it's still gonna take them a minute or so to see a 200KB image....


...you have cable modem and others fast internet users too.... So I guess 
that 200KB is a good compromise for all users....

My 2cents....


Ciao!

Mart


-- 
-+======================+-


 bad### [at] hotmailDOTcom
-+======================+-

Post a reply to this message