"Nathan Kopp" <nat### [at] koppcom> wrote in news:3c62020d$1@news.povray.org:

> You're gonna need a lot more photons than that.  :-)  I'd go for at
> least a few million, maybe even in the tens of millions for the
> resolution you're looking at here.
> 
> -Nathan

Yikes!  OK, I'll give it a try tonight.

-- 
Rich Allen
(Remove SPAM from my address to reply by e-mail)

Post a reply to this message