"Nathan Kopp" <nat### [at] kopp com> wrote in news:3c62020d$1@news.povray.org:
> You're gonna need a lot more photons than that. :-) I'd go for at
> least a few million, maybe even in the tens of millions for the
> resolution you're looking at here.
>
> -Nathan
Yikes! OK, I'll give it a try tonight.
--
Rich Allen
(Remove SPAM from my address to reply by e-mail)
Post a reply to this message
|