Peter Popov <pet### [at] vipbg> wrote in 
news:i9ae5u0kkkncqodnmkse9dn6utgds3iaej@4ax.com:

> On 29 Jan 2002 12:17:59 -0500, che### [at] sympaticoca (Coridon Henshaw)
> wrote:
> 
>>> Neither is correct.  Both work at any place in the camera statement.
> 
>>Try it yourself.
> 
> I suggest you trust Thorsten on this one. After all, he made the
> changes to the camera code in question :)

If a coder says his code does one thing but his executable does another 
(which it does; run the examples and you'll see it, too), I think you can 
understand that I'll take the executable at face value and suggest that the 
coder doublecheck his code.

Post a reply to this message