in <3AA2B1D7.1530E613@gmx.de> Christoph Hormann wrote:

>> I think it makes sense in this case...actually, "blurred_pattern"
>> seems even better. Just plain "blur" seems kind of ambiguous...it
>> doesn't seem as apparent that the *pattern* is what is being
>> blurred. 
>> 
>
>All right, since English is not my native language i will not argue
>that. 

Should it be a pattern at all? Why not as a method of 'transformation' 
like turbulence, maybe even within a warp statement.

pigment{
    	wood
    	warp{ blurr .... }
}

Ingo

-- 
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray    : http://members.home.nl/seed7/

Post a reply to this message