in <3AA2B1D7.1530E613@gmx.de> Christoph Hormann wrote:
>> I think it makes sense in this case...actually, "blurred_pattern"
>> seems even better. Just plain "blur" seems kind of ambiguous...it
>> doesn't seem as apparent that the *pattern* is what is being
>> blurred.
>>
>
>All right, since English is not my native language i will not argue
>that.
Should it be a pattern at all? Why not as a method of 'transformation'
like turbulence, maybe even within a warp statement.
pigment{
wood
warp{ blurr .... }
}
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|