In article <471fc224@news.povray.org>, 
nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom says...

> > What exactly is the point of harping on a few sentences out of dozens o
f 
> > things I have posted on this, ***after*** I already admitted, had you
 
> > bothered to read anything other than this post, that my idea was flawed
, 
> > you could still get what I was looking for in a way that isn't too 
> > dissimilar from what Warp was suggesting instead and that the other 
> > people had a point about storing the stuff the way I suggested being a
 
> > bad idea? Other than, that is, to be a bigger ass than I made myself 
> > look with the comment you are quoting?
> 
> Sorry, I'm still catching up with posts (in chronological order, at 
> least within threads), and I usually reply them as I read them, not 
> after reading the whole thread. Bad habit, maybe.
> 
That's OK. I kind of over reacted. It was like 3 days since anyone 
bothered to post anything about it, and the first thing someone did was 
a rant about my behavior, which I admit wasn't too congenial at that 
point in the conversation thread. :p But, I have some times done the 
same thing myself, when dropping in to the middle of a long series of 
posts, so...

-- 
void main () {

    call functional_code()
  else
    call crash_windows();
}

<A HREF='http://www.daz3d.com/index.php?refid=16130551'>Get 3D Models,
 
3D Content, and 3D Software at DAZ3D!</A>

Post a reply to this message