|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <3b192a70@news.povray.org>, Tek says...
> I changed my mind! Here's a bigger render, from a nicer camera angle.
> Unfortunately the motion blur isn't quite high enough quality for this
> resolution, but other than that I'm very happy with it :)
>
> A change to the physics now means that the balls can escape through the open
> side of the box, which means the render has less things to draw, so this 200
> frame higher-res version took a /mere/ 6 hours!
>
> --
> Tek
Even more impressive! A pity that rendering an animation still is so
very time consuming; I would like to see more of it :)
--
Regards, Sander
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |