|
 |
In article <38efaa3e@news.povray.org>,
per### [at] aol com?subject=PoV-News says...
> Glad you could make it, welcome.
> It would probably have been best to just upload the Bmp instead of Ico, since
> the idea is to see it here. Although unless you know already other larger Bmp
> files may as well be taboo so Jpg is the preferred choice. More to know if you
> haven't read the povray.frequently-asked-questions group here yet, will tell
> plenty about things at these newsgroups.
I did upload the bmp. It just had the extension changed to .ico :)
If you want to see the original .bmp, change the file name from
Classic_Icon.ico to Classic_Icon.bmp.
The reason I didn't encode it to .jpg is that I couldn't see the point
with a 3k image. If I had rendered it at 800x800 or somesuch, then yes,
I'd have jpeg'd it.
For those who are interested in such things, it took 6 minutes 29 seconds
for the 32x32 image to render on a PII-300, mainly because of AA0.01, 9x9
samples, and maximum depth of 5...
Hohum, thanks for the comments anyway. And just for you, I'll post the
entire 1.3k .jpg <grin>
Bye for now,
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
