On Wed, 14 May 2003 16:58:12 +0200, "Hugo Asm" <hua### [at] post3teledk> wrote:
> > I considered using trace(), but then decided against it
>
> I've tried your macro and it works! But it seems to generate some
> unnecessary triangles, like small lines that nearly go by unnoticed. Besides
> that I had a shock at the parsing time.  ;o)  As 80x80x80 segments takes
> forever (I guess that's the penalty) guess what, I am going to need
> something like 1000x1000x500 on a slow isosurface, so this method is out of
> the question. Unfortunately. I'll try with trace and hope it's faster.

http://www.silvertome.com/packages/triscan.html

ABX

Post a reply to this message