|
 |
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:06:16 +0100, "Apache"
<apa### [at] hotmail com> wrote:
>I understand IMBJR in his desire to promote an improved image format, but
>compatibility is very important here.
>As long as the common news readers and webbrowsers don't support an image
>format it's better to stick with tradition.
>Top quality images should be in png anyways (or 100% quality jpeg maybe) and
>for showing a new render to others the standard jpeg format seems to be
>sufficient. I haven't heard anything complain!
There are not meant to be top-quality, just better quality. If I had a
better connection I'd post the TIFF - but then again, actually I would
not because that's inappropriate to this venue.
>
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
