On 5/22/24 06:32, Bald Eagle wrote:
> Better would be to allow spline {} to take any function as a
> spline definition (whether it would make sense to from a spline perspective or
> not).

That's an interesting idea. Where the functions support 't' or at least 
a rough equivalent I suppose.

Once in a while I look at Ingo's gradient.inc with the idea of 
supporting something like that whole collection as one inbuilt function 
with 'modes' or 'selections' to run each.

Bill P.

Post a reply to this message