On 2022-01-26 09:19 (-4), Cousin Ricky wrote:
> On 2022-01-25 08:55 (-4), William F Pokorny wrote:
>>
>> Agree, though, I still don't get what all is happening there to get the
>> milky effect. On the overdone sphere - remember I'm testing limits not
>> going for any given look. Even the milky effect I found by using bump
>> sizes larger than what I think most would / should typically use in
>> practice.
>>
>> [...]
> 
> I've used bump_size as high as 2, with f_ridged_mf used as a normal,
> though not in an attempt at micronormal effects.  I did not see any sign
> of normal inversion.

I just looked back at my images, and though f_ridged_mf() showed no
signs of inversion, f_ridge() most certainly did.  However, I have not
checked to see whether the inversion was due to bump_size.

waves-ridge2.jpg uses f_ridged_mf() bump_size 2.
waves-ridge3.jpg uses f_ridged() bump_size 2.

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'waves-ridge2.jpg' (122 KB) Download 'waves-ridge3.jpg' (72 KB)

Preview of image 'waves-ridge2.jpg'

Preview of image 'waves-ridge3.jpg'