|
|
Op 31/10/2021 om 17:17 schreef Kenneth:
> "Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>>
>> Long ago, I rendered a "Merry Christmas" image...
>>
>> The general idea is to have a very thin slice of translucent white (somewhat
>> broken up) to appear inside the ice-- like a crack or fracture. Perhaps
>> something similar might work for your crystal.
>
> I found my original scene file from 2007(!), and re-rendered one of the ice
> objects. I've attached the render as the code existed then. But looking at my
> code, I see that I had used simple textures for the ice cracks, bubbles,
> etc-- which are just surface attributes, not 'volumetric' inside the ice. At the
> time, I didn't know how to do such interior tricks... which was frustrating.
>
> BTW, this was my actual 'crack' pigment:
> pigment{
> marble // marble or wrinkles
> color_map{
> [0.0 rgbt 1]
> [0.487 rgbt 1]
> [0.492 rgbt <1,1,1,.5>]
> [0.508 rgbt <1,1,1,.5>]
> [0.513 rgbt 1]
> [1.0 rgbt 1]
> }
> warp{turbulence 4 lambda .2}
> scale 40
> warp{turbulence .5 lambda .2}
> }
>
> But my main ice material makes use of MEDIA (as does your crystal)-- so these
> 'surface' pigment patterns, being 3-D of course, could be made into functions
> instead, then used as additional densities or density_map(s) for the media
> itself... by way of 3 color functions there, like this simplified example...
> media{
> emission <1,0,0> // for the RED channel
> density{function{PIGMENT_FUNCTION(x,y,z).red}}
> }
>
> This way, my cracks and bubbles will show up INSIDE the ice, as I had originally
> wanted. And I think that this technique might work for your crystal too. (The
> interior 'bubbles' or voids you mentioned could possibly be made with 'media
> voids'-- e.g., areas in the pigment/function that have rgb <0,0,0>, which would
> produce NO media density there, I think. Just a guess though.)
>
> Without your crystal post here, I would not have thought of revisiting my ice
> scene with these changes. Thanks! :-)
>
Thanks for this Kenneth! At first glance, even these 'surface' patterns
look great. I guess that your 'media' variant will work; I shall turn to
that soon, as I have currently a render with 'real' bubbles (spheres,
15000 of them) rendering. It looks good at first glance but the render
time has dropped severely, although not dramatically. I am not yet sure
about those 'media voids'... I shall have to think about that.
I shall make asap a scene file available and post it here. At this
moment, it is in a terrible flux state and hardly readable, even for me. ;-)
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|