On 3/23/21 9:28 AM, Thorsten wrote:
> On 23.03.2021 13:28, Ash Holsenback wrote:
>> ah ok... you posting here reminded me of one other item i needed to 
>> look at is the multilink extension you implemented. i see 6 files in 
>> the tarball that chris made available. i don't see /any/ mysql calls 
>> that need to be converted to mysqli... appears you're doing it 
>> differently. want me to email you an archive of those files so you can 
>> review/bless/decide /not/ to implement your code.
> 
> Does it even still work? It was very fragile depending on MediaWiki 
> version...
> 
> Thorsten

yes it was working before the crash... however a /big/ performance hit 
when editing/saving the reserved keywords page (it's loaded with 
multi-links). having said that... i'm in favor of backing this extension 
out. not sure what the busted link fallout will be. i'm hoping isolated 
because i've /not/ been using the format. lol... remember i was /not/ 
pleased with the implementation, because at the release (last minute) i 
had to find a way to deal with those links. i think i /might/ be able to 
coax wikidocgen to help find them because i already have a case test in 
the code.

Post a reply to this message