On 10/29/20 5:20 AM, Ive wrote:
<snip>
> A final remark: not using assumed_gamma 1.0 causes hue-shifts that
> become more dramatic the more complex the lighting situation is AND it
> violates the very basic low of energy conservation. There is no brick
> wall that reflects more light than shines on it.
> If one has no problem with this two issues I'm absolutely fine with this
> but please do not complain about unexpected results.
> And if somebody uses assumed_gamma 2.2 and produces a brilliant image
> I'm glad for him but this proofs nothing and is no reason to start this
> discussion again.
lol...thud (thanks btw)
Post a reply to this message
|