|
|
Op 06/11/2019 om 11:15 schreef jr:
> the '#ifdef()' idiom though ought to work in any case (it does here).
>
It does! My bad.
Interesting test following this earlier post:
Op 04/11/2019 om 09:09 schreef Thomas de Groot:
> - rotating the object changes the 'tightness' of the standard BB. I
did that with a simple cylinder: when properly aligned along one of the
axis, the BB test is always optimal; rotate the cylinder (e.g.
<45,45,45>) and do the test, and the standard BB becomes too wide.
>
I have to correct this: The BB only becomes slightly less optimal in the
example cited. With increasing complexity of the object however,
optimisation kicks in.
(1) use the following object: superellipsoid {<0.50, 3.50>}. The test is
optimal.
(2) change the object to: superellipsoid {<0.50, 3.50> rotate 45}. The
BB has now 'at least 5% "slack".'
--
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|