On 05/02/2018 08:05, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 4-2-2018 13:35, Stephen wrote:
>> On 04/02/2018 12:13, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> On 4-2-2018 9:18, Stephen wrote:
>>>> On 04/02/2018 07:39, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>> On 3-2-2018 10:13, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/02/2018 07:43, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2-2-2018 21:14, Bald Eagle wrote:
>>>>>>>> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't even take on "the wise old man of the forest",role?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I was thinking he'd be the cantankerous guy with the hoarse 
>>>>>>>> voice, dressing down
>>>>>>>> these fancy young whippersnappers.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Back when I was your age, we used to raytrace the old fashioned 
>>>>>>>> way: with a

>>>>>>>> _And we liked it._"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Pshaw! That's what we did, didn't we? Grain by grain by grain. 
>>>>>>> First dressing the menhir down of course.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll stop you now. I've heard it. ;-)
>>>>>> This is the one where you meet up with Cohen the Barbarian and the 
>>>>>> strange fellow with a traffic cone as a hat. Isn't it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes Terry. ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Alas not. :-(
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not?
>>>
>> Yes, Not.
>>
>>
> 
> Well, that is quite definitive indeed. Not even a little tiny bit of yes?
> 

It would be presumptuous otherwise, would it not?

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message