On 6/7/2017 4:56 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Jun 2017 05:25:58 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>
>> Understood.
>> But consider the carnage they could have caused if firearms were readily
>> available here.
>> With that in mind. They weren't very effective. Considering they had the
>> element of surprise.
>
> Absolutely.  But some here will say "see, they found a way in spite of
> the fact that there aren't firearms readily available"

Naturally that is what people do. Whatever the issue.

> - and will ignore
> the fact that this was a largely ineffective attack.
>


I think it is a little bit taboo to bring that up. Either you don't want 
to admit it. Or, if you are on the other side (mine) it would be 
offensive to the victims and their families.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message