On 1/12/2017 2:34 AM, Stephen wrote:
>
> I don't know how you could be bothered analysing it. It reeked of
> misdirection and false assumptions, as you show. And their presentation
> is too polished for what it is.
>

Surprisingly, it was actually sort of interesting to analyze, and forced 
me to think more than I had about the various ways the term 
"information" can be used in the context of physics.  So I actually feel 
like I learned a little bit from the analysis.

I guess, even when you see a magic show where you know the magician is 
exploiting misdirection and false assumptions, it's still sometimes fun 
to try and figure out how they did it.

Post a reply to this message