On 12/4/2016 11:36 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Dec 2016 09:19:16 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 12/2/2016 8:10 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 02 Dec 2016 15:53:45 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>>
>>>>> but you both seemed to be enjoying yourselves
>>>>
>>>> But really It was John and Jim Henderson that played it. I only got
>>>> dragged in because I have a rule book and live in Uxbridge, home of
>>>> the famous dictionary. :)
>>>
>>> Oh, you were a full participant and you know it. ;)
>>
>> I think that there is some blame spreading here. ;)
>
> Well, I'm not the one who forgot that the diagonals were open in that
> game. ;)
>

My point exactly.

>>> You didn't spend *that* much time in huff.
>>>
>>>
>> True, mostly in bedlam. :P
>
> Well, I can't argue that. :D
>

No you can't. (It counts towards my community order.)

>>> We might need a game in memoriam sometime early next year.
>>>
>>>
>> Without more contestants it would be like playing /Solitaire Bridge/.
>
> True.  Though we did have a few occasional players who dropped in on the
> game, too.  But to work well, you really need a minimum of 3, and
> preferably 4.
>

Or 5 for the chair to calm down the bickering. That's his job.


-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message