On 9/19/2016 8:14 PM, Doctor John wrote:
> On 19/09/16 20:04, Stephen wrote:
>> On 9/19/2016 7:57 PM, Doctor John wrote:
>>> On 19/09/16 19:41, Doctor John wrote:
>>>> On 19/09/16 18:35, Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On 9/19/2016 6:05 PM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:43:14 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9/19/2016 2:37 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 09:51:43 +0100, Stephen wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I feel a walkabout in my waters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dartford
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seeing as you ended up in Huff, I have no option but to move to
>>>>>>>> Queensway.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So he better make his move PDQ or it's rule 14a.
>>>>>>> And you know how he hates that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, but we love how he hates it. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I admit to some small satisfaction. :)
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I shall ignore the fact that, under rule 28672, you have
>>>>>>>>>> incurred a
>>>>>>>>>> penalty; after all, old age does funny things to both your
>>>>>>>>>> eyesight
>>>>>>>>>> and your memory :-P
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are confusing me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think that was his goal. :D
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It was certainly mine. ;)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mission accomplished, then. :D
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> :D
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Sorry I'm late, guys. It's been one of those days.
>>>> On the principle that neither of you has invoked rule 14a using the
>>>> time-honoured tradition of giving Samantha a poke, I move to:
>>>>
>>>> Southwark (I fancy taking in some Shakespeare at the Globe)
>>>>
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>
>>> BTW The next person to post has the honour of taking us the 75% mark.
>>>
>>
>> That would be me if you hadn't put me in Huff.
>>
>>
> You should really start to read the judgements made against you. I ruled
> that you were in Huff until I made my next move; I made it, ergo you are
> no longer in Huff.
>

Not when I replied to that post but since you insist. I put myself in 
Huff with a puff.



-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message