On 8/16/2016 6:08 PM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> Le 16/08/2016 à 17:40, Stephen a écrit :
>> On 8/16/2016 4:31 PM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
>>> Le 16/08/2016 à 14:26, Stephen a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> But nobody checked if it was to be installed on the moon, or on mars...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If it is not in the spec then it will cost extra. Probably best to leave it to
phase 2.
>>>
>>> Customer: Of course it always was. You didn't ask, your fault. No extra.
>>>
>>
>> If it is not in the Blueprint, that you signed, it is extra.
>
> The delivery time-chart  was signed by the committee on the second weekly meeting.
> Promising the signature of the specification by T0+1 month... but they keep debating
on the content at every weekly meeting, rolling back some previous decisions, or
amending them just a bit. Whatever, it was stated that the full delivery of project
(phase 5) was due on
> T0+12 months, so you must deliver or won't get paid for that part.
> That the specifications for phase 5 are still unsigned is another issue. YOU MUST
DELIVER, and IT MUST SUCCEED THE TESTS which will be finalized AFTER your delivery.
>

Yawn! You forget. I am a contractor.
I am not doing it until a signature.



> And the day before you deliver, the committee agree that the new standard published
two days ago must be part of the next delivery.
>

Not my problem comrade. :-P

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message