|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 18/10/2015 11:00 AM, clipka wrote:
> I would suspect that a fully /ANSI-compliant/ C compiler isn't really
> that big of a deal to implement, given how much stuff in the standard is
> explicitly "implementation specific" or "undefined".
>
> Writing a C compiler that meets common /expectations/ about the C
> language, now that would be an entirely different thing.
I am not enough of a C expert to comment definitively. Implementing C++
sounds nightmarishly hard! (Template metaprogramming, anyone?)
And yet, since these are both extremely popular languages, there's
thousands of implementations...
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |