scott <sco### [at] scottcom> wrote:
> But there are two big downsides IMHO. First and most importantly the 
> image resolution is absolutely atrocious. I'm only used to 1680x1050 
> monitors at home, but this is like going back to 320x240 days. I know 
> they're using a 1920x1080 panel under the hood, but this is shared 
> between two eyes and it's not used all the way to the edges.

I don't really understand how 1920x1080 (or even 960x1080) can look
like 320x240. That would be like 20% of the vertical resolution.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message