Am 22.08.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Anthony D. Baye:
> That said: The fixed types with -exactly- 8, 16, 32 or 64 bits appear to be
> optional, so there's no guarantee they'll be defined...
> 
> that would be aggravating.

... ah, you noticed that alredy.
Did you also note the part where it says that the signed variants are
only present if negatives use two's complement format?

One more thing that bugs me is that standards /still/ don't provide a
straightforward way to detect the byte ordering of the standard integer
data types (unless I missed some recent news).

Post a reply to this message