On 7/15/2015 11:05 PM, Anthony D. Baye wrote:
> Stephen <mca### [at] aolcom> wrote:
>> On 7/15/2015 8:52 AM, Anthony D. Baye wrote:
>>> "Anthony D. Baye" <Sha### [at] spamnomorehotmailcom> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> For the record: It's not that good. About all they've got going for them is that
>>> they are polite and, so far, honest.
>>>
>>
>> Polite and honest are good. :-)
>
> Perhaps true but, to earn more than three stars from me, they would need to send
> me a working device.
>

Fair point! It is high on my requirements too. :-)

> As it is, they sent me two damaged keyboards, which I then had to return at my
> own expense.  While they responded to my complaints, promptly and politely, and
> actually did refund the money as soon as I sent them a tracking number for the
> second keyboard, they did not compensate me for the extra $8 that I spent on
> postage.
>
As Scott said...


> So the most they'll get from me is two stars.
>

Quite generous considering the circumstances.

-- 

Regards
     Stephen

Post a reply to this message