|
|
On 24/06/2015 12:06, Thomas de Groot wrote:
> On 24-6-2015 10:02, Stephen wrote:
>> On 24/06/2015 08:22, Thomas de Groot wrote:
>>> Oh yes! While I jokingly mentioned the RSoCP I fully realised the
>>> implications your rules would have on them.
>>
>> Pictures!
>> Not real if there is no proof. :-)
>>
>>
> We are not allowed RSoCP pictures in this n.g., sir ;-)
>
I know the rules. But I thought for you they could be bent.
Since uncle Ken moved on. We are sliding into decadence. :-)
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|