On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:08:11 +0100, scott wrote:

> And there's still a lot of $120's in $1.2m. Even if a company has 100
> developers all needing a license, that's 100 years until you get to
> £1.2m in revenue. Which is why I would be surprised there is nothing in
> the £10/month version that prevents large companies (who are
> willing/able to pay $1.2m straight off) from using it.

You also have to consider the addition of all the companies that would 
never pay $1.2 million but are willing to pay for 100 licenses at $10/
month per developer.

I'm sure CryTek did the math.

Jim

-- 
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and 
besides, the pig likes it." - George Bernard Shaw

Post a reply to this message