>> And if they were clever they would put something in the license of the
>> $10/month version that prevented the huge companies using it, thus
>> keeping the 10 people paying $1.2 million at the same time :-)
>
> I would be surprised if they did, actually - in the long run, the monthly
> subscription would generally net them more than a perpetual license would.

There's a lot of $10's in $1.2m :-)

Post a reply to this message