On 25.11.2014 2:23, Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> interesting variants might be>> 0.5 * (PR1(x,y,z).filter + PR2(x,y,z).filter)>> or>> max(PR1(x,y,z).filter,PR2(x,y,z).filter)
and of course the inverse interpretation of multiplication:
1 - (1-PR1(x,y,z).filter)*(1-PR2(x,y,z).filter)