> Hi(gh)!
>
> On 01.10.2014 21:28, clipka wrote:
>
>> ... whatever "king-for-a-day Progressivism" or "the king-for-a-day
>> premise" is.
>
> It would be better to have this explained by Shay himself, rather than
> to look it up using Google (it's tempting, but the chance is high to end
> up with a strangely different definition, not to mention lunatic fringe
> rantings on the issue)...

I did indeed google it, but didn't find anything I could remotely make 
sense of in the context of Shay's posting.

Post a reply to this message