Le 2014-10-06 09:53, clipka a écrit :
> Am 06.10.2014 13:48, schrieb Francois Labreque:
>> Le 2014-10-03 19:57, Doctor John a écrit :
>>> I've been using gpg for some years now. It works.
>>>
>>> Now Scentrics come up with,what they say is a more secure new method to
>>> prevent MITM attacks:
>>>
>>
>> It's actually the opposite.  Their patent is to specifially allow MITM
>> attacks (from Law Enforcement).
>
> For a bit of nitpicking, from the quoted portion of the patent
> application it's not clear whether it is actually a MITM attack or just
> plain eavesdropping with a backdoor to the cryptographic stuff.
>
You're right, it's not really a MITM attack, but the end result is the 
same.

-- 
/*Francois Labreque*/#local a=x+y;#local b=x+a;#local c=a+b;#macro P(F//
/*    flabreque    */L)polygon{5,F,F+z,L+z,L,F pigment{rgb 9}}#end union
/*        @        */{P(0,a)P(a,b)P(b,c)P(2*a,2*b)P(2*b,b+c)P(b+c,<2,3>)
/*   gmail.com     */}camera{orthographic location<6,1.25,-6>look_at a }

Post a reply to this message