|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Am 04.10.2014 10:40, schrieb Le_Forgeron:
> On 04/10/2014 04:32, clipka wrote:
>> Am 04.10.2014 01:57, schrieb Doctor John:
>>> I've been using gpg for some years now. It works.
>>>
>>> Now Scentrics come up with,what they say is a more secure new method to
>>> prevent MITM attacks:
>>>
>>>
http://www.standard.co.uk/business/business-news/new-cybersecurity-breakthrough-by-london-tech-firm-scentrics-9772661.html
>>>
>>
>> "Only the security services would be able to gain access to the messages
>> if they needed to."
>>
>> Wow. Yeah. Exactly the type of security we need. <Facepalm>
>>
> Looks like a patent to provision a solution against new Apple strategy
> "we do not have the key".
>
> Patent it now, have it mandatory (Hey Apple, you must do it in your
> apps) by law, profit.
Absolutely. Also, put a lid on other poorly controllable stuff like
PGP/GPG, now that people have grown a heightened awareness of security
issues but start to forget /why/.
I'm not normally in for conspiracy theories (except for the fun they can
be at times), but this one smells like bad intentions even to me.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |